Showing posts with label ARA San Luis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ARA San Luis. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 25, 2024

Malvinas: Captain Azcueta and the ARA San Luis Performance

“I am ready”: the Captain’s Courage the Day the Firing Computer of the ARA San Luis Submarine Broke Down in Malvinas

The recovery of the Malvinas Islands on April 2, 1982 took the commanders of the submarine force by surprise, as they had not been informed of Operation Rosario. Nevertheless, they prepared as best they could a submarine with serious technical deficiencies and sailed with it within the exclusion zone. The decision of Frigate Captain Fernando María Azcueta and his inexperienced crew. And the order to destroy the enemy with the only possibility of firing torpedoes manually.

By Mariano Sciaroni || Infobae


The drumbeat of war on April 2, 1982 surprised the ARA San Luis (S-32) and all its crew, including its commander, Frigate Captain Fernando María Azcueta, 40 years old and son of one of the first submariners of the Argentine Navy. It was docked at a pier at the Mar del Plata Naval Base (BNMP), base of operations for the Navy's small submarine force.



ARA San Luis departs from Mar del Plata Naval Base

The surprise was due to the fact that the high naval command, in order to maintain the secrecy of the operation carried out that day, chose not to inform the commanders of the various units not directly involved about Operation Rosario: the capture of the Malvinas.

Therefore, the San Luis did not receive the order to prepare for a combat patrol until 24 hours after the assault on the islands. At that time, the recently completed crew began to prepare the ship, in order to make it fit for war in the shortest possible time.

The initial state of the submarine was not satisfactory and it greatly needed to enter dry dock, something that would have to be done at the Puerto Belgrano Naval Base, the main base of the Navy, since Mar de Plata lacked such facilities.

The hull, propeller and internal cooling pipes of the San Luis had accumulations of small parasitic crustaceans, which affected its performance, increased its noise level and limited its speed. However, as there was not enough time to travel to Puerto Belgrano, the clean-up was carried out in Mar del Plata by divers (students from the Diving School) who worked 24 hours a day, equipped with manual scrapers, for almost a week.

Frigate Captain Fernando María Azcueta speaks to his crew during the 1982 war patrol. The beard indicates that they had already been at sea for quite a few days

Despite intense efforts before departure, several critical issues with the unit remained unresolved. One diesel engine had been out of service since 1976 due to a broken engine block, and the other three suffered from cooling problems that limited their power. Additionally, the snorkel frequently allowed seawater into the submarine, and the bilge pumps were unreliable. The DUUX system, a passive acoustic rangefinder, was deemed inaccurate and out of service.

Survival equipment also posed significant concerns. The life raft ejection system was non-operational, hydrogen burners were outdated, and the oxygen meter was being repaired on land. Gas measurement capsules, crucial for safety, had expired in 1976. This was particularly concerning given that the submarine was considered modern, having been incorporated in 1974.

The crew’s training level was compromised by the Argentine Navy’s personnel rotation policy, which resulted in many new and inexperienced crew members aboard. Key positions, including those in fire control systems, were held by junior non-commissioned officers, as the most experienced submariners were in West Germany overseeing the construction of new TR 1700-class submarines.

Lieutenant Luis Seghezzi, an exceptionally young Chief of Navigation, had just graduated from the Submarine School in late 1981. He reflected on the high turnover among the crew, acknowledging that most had only been on board for three months and that this was his first experience with the submarine's weapon systems. He noted that while high turnover allowed for more personnel to be trained in new technologies, it did not necessarily ensure better responses in unprecedented situations, such as those faced during the mission.

 

ARA San Luis's trajectory from the "Enriqueta" area to the exclusion zone, finally entering the "María" patrol area, within the Exclusion Zone
 

While the senior officers of the San Luis had extensive experience with submarines, neither Captain Azcueta nor his second-in-command had any with Type 209 submarines like the San Luis. Azcueta himself had only spent 16 days at sea as commander before the war began, having taken command on December 19, 1981.

On April 11, late in the afternoon, the submarine, fully loaded with water, provisions, 10 SST-4 guided torpedoes, and 14 Mk 37 Mod 3 torpedoes, set sail from Mar del Plata with its 35 crew members. Second Corporal Eduardo Lavarello recalls the departure on that Easter Sunday as a cold, foggy evening, which was ideal for remaining undetected as they headed out to sea.

By April 13, Captain Azcueta reported the results of engine tests to his superiors, confirming that the engines operated acceptably up to 1200 amps, achieving a maximum submerged speed of 20 knots. Despite the numerous challenges—limited experience with the Type 209, an inexperienced crew, mechanical issues, and unreliable weapons—Azcueta's message concluded with the resolute words, “I am ready.” This declaration, made in the face of daunting odds and the prospect of confronting the world’s leading navy in anti-submarine warfare, encapsulates the captain’s bravery and determination.

On April 17, 1982, after an uneventful transit during which the captain continued to train his crew and address mechanical issues, the submarine received a coded message. They were ordered to proceed to a waiting area designated as “Enriqueta,” located southeast of Golfo Nuevo, near the Argentine mainland and just north of the British-established Exclusion Zone.




The VM-8/24 computer is out of service

Initially, due to ongoing diplomatic negotiations, there were strict Rules of Engagement that limited the use of weapons, similar to those imposed on British forces. Weapons could only be used within the Maritime Exclusion Zone and after positively identifying a target, except in cases of submerged contacts, which were presumed to be enemy vessels.

Two days later, the VM-8/24 fire control computer on the ARA San Luis failed completely, despite the crew's efforts to repair it. Captain Azcueta later explained that the computer lost its display and the target panels became unresponsive to sensor commands. The crew attempted multiple troubleshooting steps, including checking power supplies and adjusting voltage levels, but the computer remained largely nonfunctional, though it could still operate in a limited emergency mode.

The fire control computer is critical for a modern attack submarine, as it processes sensor data, calculates firing solutions, and controls torpedo guidance. The VM-8/24 system on the San Luis could track and prepare solutions for up to three targets simultaneously, integrating sonar, radar, and periscope data to determine positions and vectors.

The computer’s failure was a severe blow, leaving the submarine unable to use its automatic fire control system. This limitation meant that the San Luis could only fire a single torpedo at a time, which had to be manually guided by the crew, significantly reducing the submarine’s combat effectiveness.


With the breakdown of the computer, according to the post-war report, there was:

  • Loss of the ability to automatically and instantly update the positions of the submarine, target and torpedo.
  • Loss of the ability to accurately calculate the Aiming Angle (Torpedo Course) and its instant update.
  • Poor precision of the manual guidance system dial (graduations every 5° by design)
  • Practical impossibility of estimating the position of the torpedo and, as a consequence, serious difficulty in introducing effective corrections.


The seriousness of the breakdown led Azcueta to break the traditional radio silence with which submarines move and inform his superiors. The Commander of the Submarine Force (COFUERSUB) recognized the problem, but decided not to withdraw the ARA San Luis from the waiting area, after assessing the convenience of having at least one submarine patrolling despite the limitations it faced.

According to doctrine, the failure of the computer implies a “low probability of impact” and, therefore, the use of torpedoes is “in case of defensive launches and if no other weapon is available”. Therefore, it was considered that the failure of the computer implied “that the fulfillment of the unit's mission would be practically unfeasible”.


Inside the San Luis, however, and despite knowing the new limitations with which they would go to war, they were somewhat optimistic. As Lieutenant Ricardo Alessandrini, the submarine's Chief of Armament, recalls: “The firing control computer was not operational and left us short of capacity in the waiting area. This limited the number of torpedo shots that could be controlled from the submarine. However, in the submarine force we often practiced the old-fashioned method of firing torpedoes using manual calculations and it was entirely possible to carry out a successful attack with good information about our target.”

That is, the S-32 crew would launch torpedoes using plottings and abacuses, in the same way that straight-running torpedoes were launched at short distances until the beginning of World War II.

Captain Azcueta also narrates: “As has been said, during the stay in the Enriqueta area, we took advantage of the stoppage to intensify the training in the different roles and to adjust ship values ​​that we had not updated. Among them the so-called “cavitation threshold”. In a submarine, the speed at which its propellers cavitate (a fluid phenomenon that produces an undesirable and significant noise of its own), depends on the depth and increases with it. That is, if I increase the immersion plane, I can apply more speed without cavitating. With resignation we verified that, whatever the depth, up to 150 meters, we cavitated at 6 knots. This circumstance led me to be very cautious with the speed in the patrol area. It became evident that, despite the great effort of the student divers of the Diving School, the propeller had not been sufficiently cleaned. There was nothing to be done.

By April 26, the negotiations on the fate of the islands were practically closed. COFUERSUB (Command of the Submarine Force) decided to send the San Luis to the “María” patrol zone, located north of the islands. It arrived there on the 28th, not without danger.

In the afternoon of the same day, with the deterioration of the military and political situation, the S-32 received the order to destroy any enemy target if it found it within the Exclusion Zone around the islands: “From COFUERSUB to San Luis. I cancel restrictions on the use of weapons. All contact is enemy.”

Even with all the problems mentioned and a broken firing computer (the brain of the submarine), the San Luis would cover itself in glory in the days to come. Admiral Brown would have been proud of this brave Navy lad.

Friday, December 8, 2023

Malvinas: ARA San Luis Heros

ARA San Luis War Patrol  - 1982

Source: Malvinas: Tras los submarinos ingleses 

 
Lieutenant Commander Ricardo Alessandrini, Chief of Armaments and Lieutenant Alejandro Maegli, Chief of Communications

 

The ship's crew at the end of the 1982 naval year




Lieutenant Commander Alessandrini, in a wet suit, ready to check some noises coming from the free movement area of the submarine


Lieutenant Commander Alessandrini, Lieutenant Commander Luis Seghezzi, Corvettte Captain Macías y Lieutenant Maegli


Lieutenant Commander Jorge Dacharry, Electricity Chief, LC Seghezzi, Navegation Chief  y Lieutennat Maegli



Lieutenant Commander Maegli (in the periscope) y Lieutenant Fernando María Azcueta, Submarine Commander


The Commander, Frigate Captain Azcueta, harangues the crew, once the decision to return to port has been made.



Part of the crew of the San Luis, shortly after returning to port

<
The commander of the Submarine Force reviews the crew of the submarine, as soon as it arrives in port


Damián Riveros

Malvinas: Tras los submarinos ingleses 

Thursday, November 2, 2023

Malvinas: ARA San Luis against the Royal Navy

One Against All Odds


 

The secret history of the ARA San Luis submarine in Argentina in the Malvinas War

Jorge R. Bóveda 



The ARA San Luis was one of two submarine units sent in early April 1982 and the only one to face the powerful British task force face to face. Its modern technology and sophisticated sensors predicted that in the short term, losses would be terrible for the enemy. Inexplicably, after 74 days of fighting, no British ship was sunk by an Argentine torpedo. This document aims, based on the testimonies of the protagonists, to shed light on the dramatic 39 days of patrol, in which the ARA San Luis disputed (unsuccessfully) the naval supremacy of the Royal Navy in the South Atlantic.

Therefore, the testimony of an unprecedented battle between "David and Goliath", which projected beyond the conflict, provides valuable conclusions that can be drawn for the future of Argentine submarine weapons.
The brave performance of the ARA "San Luis" in extreme adversity, against an enemy many times superior in quantity and quality of anti-submarine means, demonstrates the high quality of the crew. San Luis's incredible ability to overcome such adverse circumstances is part of the most deeply rooted traditions of the Argentine Navy and, without a doubt, will be an example for new generations of submariners.


Since his retirement from active duty in 1995, the former commander of the ARA San Luis, Captain (RE) Fernando María Azcueta, has cultivated a low profile and the thorny issue of the conflict in the South Atlantic is rarely addressed outside his circle. of friends.

A few years ago, Azcueta rejected a tempting offer to put to paper his war experiences and the many interviews he gave. Since then, the subject was never addressed with all the details that are revealed in the following story, which shows for the first time, some dramatic situations of the 39 days of patrol, in which naval supremacy plays with the Royal Navy in the Atlantic South


Lightning preparation

When frigate captain D. Fernando María Azcueta, son of a prominent diver, took command at the end of December 1981, the modern 209 class submarine ARA San Luis, the hands of frigate captain D. Miguel C. Miguel C. Really, I couldn't even imagine that in just over three months, a war will be waged against the third naval power in the world.

And even less could he have foreseen the serious operational limitations that his unit suffered, and this could seriously compromise his effectiveness as a combat unit.

In mid-March 1982, while Azcueta and his men were exercising with the A-69 corvettes ARA Drummond and ARA Granville, on the coast of Mar del Plata, he received the order to stop the commission and return to port, but without receive no explanation for this unusual purpose.

Shortly after, he highlighted that the ARA Santa Fe was being prepared at the Naval Base, under the command of Lieutenant Commander Horacio Blicaini, but he did not receive any information that could alleviate the tremendous uncertainty that existed.
Only on the morning of April 2, Argentina's landing in the Malvinas was revealed to the public on radio and television throughout the country.

However, Azcueta had to wait another 24 hours to be received by COFUERSUB (captain Eulogio Latrubesse Moya), who gave the order, "Prepare in the shortest possible time to suspend (set sail)." From that moment he began a frantic race against time to see how the crew embarked with the best possible operating conditions.

 
In the image above you can see the San Luis at its base, with the aircraft carrier 25 de Mayo appearing in the background

The problems before departing

During sea trials carried out in the waters near the submarine base, the first of a series of problems was discovered when it was discovered that the San Luis could not develop a diving speed of more than 14.5 knots.

Closer inspection revealed that not only was the ship's hull and propeller covered with incrustations of small crustaceans known as "limpets" or "dog teeth," but the diesel cooling pipes were as well. This caused the engines to stop due to overheating, due to the lack of cooling water flow.

As there was no time to put the ship in dry dock to clean the hull - given the urgency of the departure - Azcueta had to turn to students from the nearby diving school, using shallow respirators as a "hookah" and do the scraping the hull "by hand" in rotating shifts of eight hours of continuous work, "to rid the hull of pests."

One of the causes of the problem originated in 1974 with the construction of the "wall" that separates the submarine dock from the civil dock in Mar del Plata.

This was built to prevent the new 209 class submarine from crashing into the dock in periods of rough seas, remaining tied up, a bad experience that had been experienced with the old "Fleet" type submersible and the veteran "Guppy", but that thanks to its design, the port had been "reconsidered", which allowed the detention of the ship.

Although laudable, the construction of a wall caused ecological changes with the lack of seawater circulation, which favored the formation of large colonies of barnacles, which had since settled in submarines docked at the dock.

On the San Luis, of the four diesel engines, only three were working, increasing the time to recharge the batteries and the exposure of the snorkel, making her extremely vulnerable to enemy search radar emissions.

The No. 1 engine had failed in early 1974, shortly after joining the Submarine Force. To repair it, it was necessary to cut the strong hull, a technology that the Argentine Navy did not have at the time.

TF Somonte, head of the ship's main propulsion, together with the Army Material Directorate and Tandanor, had managed to "free" the engine, using it until the end of 1978, when they decided to keep it out of service for safety reasons.

To make matters worse, neither the commander nor the submarine's chief weapons officer had had access to a report in mid-December 1981, which detailed the outcome of torpedo launches by the "Skip" class submarines during the period covered. between August and December of that same year, with special emphasis on the development of the exercise with the SST-4 torpedo.

The report showed that of all the launches made during this period, only once had the torpedo completed the run as planned.

A surprising percentage of launches were irregular, as a result of various factors (e.g. alteration in cable orientation, flooding of the torpedo, breakage of the strap, etc.), no one could identify the causes that led to the weapon's malfunction. .

The report in question had been released by the office of the Commander of the Sea Fleet, on which the Submarine Force depended, having failed to reverse the situation. As we will see later, the real causes of the problem would only come to light after the conflict.

Despite these serious limitations, Azcueta was heavily pressured by the political/military context in which he lived; he reported that he was able to put to sea on April 11.

The submarine sailed through the night, its small rooms stocked with food and water for a protracted war patrol, with 10 German-made SST-4 anti-surface torpedoes and 14 American MK-37 Mod. 3 anti-submarine torpedoes.

His rules of engagement prohibited him, until that moment, from any confrontation with enemy units, since it was believed that it was an offensive action that would jeopardize the negotiations that were taking place in the United Nations.

The transit to the area of operations in the Malvinas was used to carry out some minor repairs and continue with the training of personnel in the use of passive sonar, on which the survival of the submarines would depend from now on, having the latter to operate within a maritime zone completely controlled by the enemy.

On April 17, ARA San Luis arrived safely in its "fixed sanctuary" or holding area, designated with the code name "Enriqueta."

PART II: "At a disadvantage from the beginning"


Poder Naval