Wednesday, July 29, 2026

Malvinas: The Assault on Government House — An Argentine NCO’s Account

At the Head of My Group of Twelve Soldiers





Account by Marine Second Corporal and Malvinas War Veteran Conrado Augusto Olmos Matar


From the time I was a young boy, I felt a calling to pursue a career in the armed services. I wanted to become either a police officer or a serviceman. While I was at secondary school, a friend from my neighbourhood, Argentine Navy NCO Carlos Sequeira, encouraged me to continue my studies in the Navy. Some time later, personnel from that institution came to the province to promote recruitment among young men from Santiago del Estero. I did not let the opportunity pass and quickly submitted my application.

After meeting the entry requirements, I joined the Marine Infantry NCO School at Punta Mogotes. The early days were difficult because, like anyone from Santiago del Estero, I missed my homeland, its customs, my loved ones and my friends. Everything was new and different, and I felt alone among so many recruits from different parts of the country.

The training was so demanding that many of my fellow recruits requested their discharge. Of all those who had entered, only seventy-four of us graduated. Several times I came close to abandoning my career, but thanks to the encouragement and support of a lieutenant named Alemán, I was able to continue and graduate as a second corporal in 1980.

My first posting was to the 1st Marine Infantry Battalion at Puerto Belgrano, where I was received by the deputy commander, Captain Giachino, and the company commander, Lieutenant Damore. From that moment onwards, I began taking my first steps as an NCO. My duties basically consisted of training a group of soldiers while continuing to expand my own professional knowledge.

In 1981, I was placed in charge of training the Rocket Launcher Group, which consisted of twelve soldiers, including two men from Santiago del Estero, Coronel and Gutiérrez. At the beginning of 1982, my group was incorporated into C Company—Charlie Company—which was under the command of an NCO named Gigena.

I remember being particularly struck by the fact that, by that point in the year, the soldiers of the 1962 intake had still not been discharged and that training activities and exercises were continuing. Normally, operational activities were reduced during that period and replaced by maintenance duties.

One warm morning in March, the officers and NCOs were assembled on the unit’s parade ground. Captain Giachino informed us that we had to prepare to embark and sail towards some islands, where we were to recover an Argentine vessel that had been seized by the British.

Only one thought kept repeating itself in my mind: we were going to fight. You join the armed forces knowing that you may never actually have to do so, but our time had come. I mentally reviewed everything I had learnt.

From that moment onwards, we began our preparations, which mainly involved completing our stocks of supplies, field equipment and ammunition. In addition, we went to the firing range every day to practise and zero our weapons.

Our preparations continued until approximately one thousand men belonging to the Marine Infantry Brigade embarked aboard the vessel Comandante Trizar. Although we had the necessary facilities, during the first few days we suffered badly from seasickness. Despite our previous experience at sea, the conditions were so rough that virtually everyone aboard felt their effects.

Once we were well out at sea, the officers and NCOs were assembled to receive the operational order. In broad terms, our mission was to land on and seize the Malvinas Islands. Our principal objective was to overcome the forces defending Government House and remove the existing authorities.

This task was to be carried out by the Amphibious Commandos, supported by us, the Marines. The mission was by no means easy. We knew that we would be facing professional soldiers with combat experience who belonged to a major world power. The most difficult requirement, however, was that we had to defeat the enemy while attempting to avoid causing casualties. It was an extremely difficult undertaking, but in the end it was achieved.

During the night of 1–2 April, we completed our final preparations and readied our personnel and equipment for the landing. At that moment, I did not think about the historic nature of what I was about to do, because the demands of the operation and the responsibility of leading my soldiers left me no time to do so.

I thought only about how the operation would unfold, how I would react to the different situations that might arise when we encountered the enemy, and how my subordinates would respond. So many questions remained unanswered as we waited for the decisive moment when we would enter combat.

Shortly before dawn, the operation began with troops landing by helicopter. My group was ordered to proceed directly to the airport, take part in the assault to seize it and then advance towards Government House. We went forward with our teeth clenched, ready for battle.

When we arrived, we encountered no resistance. There were only a few British personnel, who had already been taken prisoner by the troops who had landed before us. Although the situation in that sector was under control, we had to exercise extreme caution because of the large number of mines and explosive booby traps that the enemy had placed in the area.

While we waited at the airport for the rest of the battalion to arrive, we could hear bursts of machine-gun fire and explosions in different parts of the island. It was only then that I fully understood that the operation had begun and that I was involved in a serious armed conflict.

I remember with great sorrow that, while we were at the airport awaiting orders, a helicopter approached carrying the body of our deputy commander, Captain Giachino. He had fought heroically at the head of his men during the most important operation carried out on the island up to that point.

The news filled us with sadness, but also with anger. An Argentine had been killed, and he was a member of our own battalion.

Once the rest of our troops had arrived, we marched towards Government House in support of the Amphibious Commandos. We surrounded the building to ensure that none of the enemy escaped. By then, they had surrendered in the face of our forces’ offensive.

My next mission was to guard the prisoners and subsequently transport them to the mainland, together with my group and other personnel.

Once back in Argentina, we prepared to carry out a new mission: reinforcing the defences of Tierra del Fuego. I travelled there with other military formations and remained there until the end of the war.

Although I spent only a short time on the Malvinas Islands, I still feel deeply moved to have taken part in the recovery operations while commanding a group of twelve soldiers. Among them were two fellow natives of Santiago del Estero, Coronel and Gutiérrez, with whom I remain on friendly terms to this day.

“As a Navy NCO, I had the honour of serving in the 1st Marine Infantry Battalion and of being under the command of Captain Giachino, an example of military virtue.”

Sunday, July 26, 2026

Argentina Rejects the MI6 Campaign Against Us: Fuck Your Own Arse, England!

Argentina Is More Than the Worst Things Said About It

The author responds to the campaign of criticism against the country in the context of the World Cup; he urges people not to be swayed by prejudice and invites us to acknowledge our failures and continue to grow


Celebrations in Buenos Aires following the victory over England in the World Cup


Esteban Bullrich
LA NACION

There are moments when silence becomes a form of surrender.

In recent weeks, I have watched as my country—and our national football team—became the target of accusations that go far beyond criticism of unacceptable behaviour. Argentina has been portrayed as a racist nation. Some have even suggested that our national identity is somehow intertwined with Nazism.

Those words hurt.

Not because Argentina is perfect. It is not.

Like every country, we have racism, prejudice, ignorance and intolerance. We have people who say offensive things, people who discriminate and people who fail to recognise the dignity of another human being. We should never deny that reality. We must confront it honestly.

But honesty also requires us to tell the whole story.

I have admired Samuel L. Jackson for decades. His work has entertained and inspired millions of people around the world, myself included. I also respect every public figure who chooses to fight racism. Humanity needs more such voices, not fewer.

Admiration, however, does not remove the responsibility to disagree when disagreement is justified.

When public figures reduce Argentina to a caricature, they overlook a history that deserves to be known.

In 1813, when much of the world still accepted slavery as normal, Argentina passed the Free Womb Law, which declared the children of enslaved women free. Forty years later, our Constitution of 1853 abolished slavery entirely.

Those decisions came half a century before Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation and a decade before the Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery throughout the United States.

This is not a contest in moral virtue.

History should never be used to declare one nation superior to another.

The point is simpler.

Facts matter.

A nation should not be judged solely by its darkest chapter, nor by its loudest voices.

Critics often point out that Nazi war criminals fled to Argentina after the Second World War. That happened. It is a stain on our history that no serious Argentine seeks to erase.

But history also tells us that many countries—including the United States, Canada and several European nations—admitted former Nazis through various immigration programmes or intelligence operations during the Cold War. Evil exploited political circumstances across several continents.

To conclude from that reality that Argentina is ‘a Nazi country’ is as unfair as saying that the United States is defined by slavery or that Europe is defined by colonialism.

Civilisations are always greater than their mistakes.



Perhaps what saddens me most is that these accusations have emerged at a time when the world desperately needs less contempt and more humility.

Humility begins by acknowledging our own failures before condemning those of others.

Every society carries wounds.

Some countries struggle with antisemitism.

Others struggle with Islamophobia.

Others with xenophobia.

Others with police violence rooted in racism.

Others with discrimination against Indigenous peoples.

No nation has completed the task of recognising the equal dignity of every human being.

Argentina certainly has not.

But neither has anyone else.

As someone living with ALS, I depend on the kindness of others for much of my life. I can no longer speak in my own voice. I can move only my eyes. The disease has stripped me of every illusion of self-sufficiency.

It has also taught me something unexpected.

When the body becomes fragile, people cease to look like categories.

There are no conservatives helping me into bed.

There are no progressives adjusting my wheelchair.

There are no Catholics, Jews, Muslims or atheists offering me comfort.

There are only human beings serving another human being.

That is where dignity begins.

And perhaps that is also where leadership should begin.

Leadership is not the ability to win arguments.

It is the willingness to seek the truth rather than applause.

True leadership rejects racism without turning entire nations into stereotypes.

It condemns hateful words without forgetting the humanity of those who spoke them.

It remembers that justice without mercy can easily become moral self-righteousness.

Football, like politics, often magnifies our worst instincts. Passion can become arrogance. Celebration can become insult. National pride can become exclusion.

When that happens, we should apologise without making excuses.

But an apology should never require us to accept false identities imposed upon us by others.

The Argentina I know is not built on hatred.

It was built by immigrants who crossed oceans carrying little more than hope.

It was built by grandparents who escaped wars.

By Jewish families who found refuge.

By Syrian and Lebanese shopkeepers.

By Italians and Spaniards who rebuilt their lives.

By teachers, doctors, farmers, workers and volunteers who quietly serve their communities every day.

That Argentina rarely makes international news.

It should.

The deepest lesson of my illness is that none of us will be remembered for the arguments we won on social media or for the insults we directed at strangers.

We will be remembered for whether we lightened another person’s burden.

Countries deserve to be measured by the same standard.

Judge Argentina by the truth.

Judge us by our entire history.

Judge us by our willingness to acknowledge our failures and continue to grow.

But please, do not judge us by stereotypes.

The world has already suffered enough because of them.

Friday, July 24, 2026

Malvinas: The First and Last Argentine Landing in Malvinas

The First and Last Argentine Landing in Malvinas

2 April – 13 June 1982

By Commodore (Ret.) Roberto Federico MELA

Malvinas-Historias de coraje

The first landing for the reconquest of the Islas Malvinas on the morning of 2 April 1982, and the final landing and take-off on the night of 13–14 June, were carried out by C-130 “Hercules” aircraft of the Argentine Air Force on the runway at Puerto Argentino. Although different crews took part, their navigator was the same person: the then Commodore Roberto Federico Mela. Here is his account.

First landing

On the night of 1 April 1982, fourteen transport aircraft of the Argentine Air Force — 5 C-130s, 4 Fokker F-28s, 2 Boeing 707s, 2 Fokker F-27s and 1 IA-50 G-II — flew from their home base at the I Air Brigade in El Palomar to various deployment bases in southern Argentina, in order to take part in Operation ARIES 82, the code name for the airborne assault operation on the runway at Puerto Argentino.

The first departure for Malvinas was scheduled for the C-130, registration TC-68, call sign LITRO UNO, from Comodoro Rivadavia Air Base, carrying Brigadier Luis Castellano, Commander of the Malvinas Air Component, his General Staff, the Argentine Air Force Special Operations Group, and personnel tasked with setting up the Air Cargo Terminal.

The departure of this first aircraft was delayed several times, until it finally took off at 05:32 hours on 2 April, heading directly towards a point located 10 kilometres east of Puerto Argentino, where it had to wait until the last British troops had evacuated the aerodrome area and until our own troops had finished removing the obstacles the enemy had scattered across the runway: tractors, vehicles, baggage carts, and so on.

Landing was finally authorised and took place at 08:23 hours. After this, the personnel being transported quickly left the aircraft and unloaded the equipment needed to establish the MALVINAS Military Air Base.

Meanwhile, in the town of Puerto Argentino, just over 2 kilometres away, the Governor’s House was being taken. Those who had just landed could hear the exchange of gunfire between the British garrison and the patriotic Marine Infantry forces.

The crew of LITRO UNO earned the distinction of having begun the air assault for the recovery of our islands, and Commodore Roberto Mela had the honour of personally taking the enemy’s main flag from the airport facilities, still then called Port Stanley. That flag is now kept in the Hall of Honour of the Cadet Corps at the Military Aviation School in Córdoba.

Final landing and take-off

The final Argentine flight to the Islas Malvinas, with landing and subsequent return take-off, was carried out by C-130 TC-65, call sign PATO. It took off from Comodoro Rivadavia Military Air Base at 15:26 hours on 13 June with a simulated flight plan to Río Grande, Tierra del Fuego. From there, it was to descend to 10–20 metres above the sea, already in complete darkness because of the time of year at those latitudes, and, making a wide detour south of the Islas Malvinas, enter Puerto Argentino from the south-east.

The flight was conducted on instruments, since visibility was completely nil due to the prevailing darkness, compounded by adverse weather with rain, sleet and saline mist from the low-level flight over the waves, which formed a filthy crust on the windscreens. No lights were switched on, except the absolute minimum needed to make out the strictly necessary instruments. Nor was it possible to use the onboard radar, and radio communications were also impossible, as such emissions would have been immediately detected by the enemy.

Despite all these difficulties, after a flight of more than three and a half hours, the aircraft was able to reach a point around 30 kilometres from Puerto Argentino at the scheduled time. There was a tolerance of 5 minutes for reaching this point, because if the aircraft arrived earlier or later than that, our own anti-aircraft artillery would open fire, considering it to be an enemy aircraft. From that position, the crew could see, to the west of the Malvinas capital, an extraordinary brightness produced by the artillery duel, the flares used to locate targets, and tracer ammunition of every kind.

Although the tactical conditions were critical, the decision was made to land, since the aircraft was carrying an element vital to the Argentine troops: a powerful 155-millimetre gun and its corresponding stock of ammunition.

After touching down, the Hercules taxied to the end of the runway furthest from Puerto Argentino, because enemy shelling was taking place near the opposite threshold and a large number of flares were illuminating the area.

The complicated task of unloading the gun, which weighed several tonnes, became even more difficult when one of its wheels became jammed against the walls of the aircraft, while the engines were running and ready for immediate departure. Suddenly, the aircraft commander was ordered from the ground to shut down the engines and abandon the aircraft, as the Puerto Argentino air-surveillance radar had detected an English CAP — Combat Air Patrol — heading directly towards the aerodrome.

In the darkness, briefly lit by flares and the bursting of artillery shells, crew members and passengers left the aircraft. They remained for almost an hour among the mud and rocks bordering the runway, waiting for the British raiders — who did not approach because of the respect they had for our effective anti-aircraft artillery — to decide to turn back once they had exhausted their fuel.

When the enemy aircraft moved away temporarily, and before another incursion could take place, the personnel returned to the Hercules, which had by then been freed of the gun. The engines were started in record time, and at 20:35 hours, amid the shrapnel scattered across the runway, “PATO” took off for the return flight with almost 70 evacuees, among them two journalists from Argentina Televisora Color: Nicolás Kasansew and Carlos Lamela.

The turbulent return route, amid the shadows of enemy warships and the threat of new combat air patrols, was flown at a height above the sea which, at times, was barely 10 metres.

In the first minutes of 14 June 1982, the Hercules landed at Comodoro Rivadavia Military Air Base, just over 9 hours after its initial departure.

That same day, a few hours later, British forces occupied the Malvinas aerodrome, discovering with surprise — and not without admiration — that Argentine transport aircraft had operated on the runway throughout the entire air and naval blockade, until the very last minute of the very last day.

Crews of the first and last Argentine flights with landing and take-off at Puerto Argentino

Islas Malvinas

2 April 1982

Aircraft: C-130 “Hercules”, registration TC-68 — LITRO UNO
Landing in Malvinas: 08:43 hours
Take-off from Malvinas: 09:20 hours

Pilot: Commodore Carlos Julio BELTRAMONE
Co-pilot: Vice-Commodore Alfredo CANO — Commander, C-130 Squadron
Navigator: Commodore Roberto Federico MELA

Flight mechanics:
Sub-Officer Adjutant Juan RYDZIK and Principal Corporal Mario CEMINO.

Cargo assistants:
Sub-Officer Adjutant Manuel CARABAJAL, Auxiliary Sub-Officer Ramón PAJÖN and Auxiliary Sub-Officer Carlos SALZANO.

13–14 June 1982

Aircraft: C-130 “Hercules”, registration TC-65 — PATO
Landing in Malvinas: 19:10 hours
Take-off from Malvinas: 20:35 hours

Pilot: Captain Víctor BORCHERT
Co-pilot: Captain Hernán DAGUERRE
Navigator: Commodore Roberto Federico MELA

Flight mechanics:
Auxiliary Sub-Officer Hugo CASTELLINI and Principal Corporal Carlos SOSA.

Cargo assistants:
Sub-Officer Adjutant Manuel CARABAJAL and Auxiliary Sub-Officer Carlos PAOLONI.

Crew doctor for the care of wounded personnel/evacuees:
First Lieutenant Guillermo MÜLLER.

Note: The crew members are listed with the military rank they held in June 1982.

Sunday, July 19, 2026

Liberating Revolution: Meteor on a Texan

Homelander?






On June 16, 1955, naval aircraft bombed the capital city of Buenos Aires in an attempt to assassinate President Perón. The first wave of attacks left many dead, and a second wave of naval aircraft was on its way, but at that moment, defenders of Buenos Aires appeared from the Morón Air Base. Lieutenant Ernesto Andradas, flying his Gloster Meteor jet fighter, intercepted one of the naval AT-6 Texans. Before opening fire, Andradas gave his rival time to force it off and then shot it down. It was the first jet aircraft shot down in the history of the continent. Sadly, this pilot would lose his wings during the military coup and spend a long time in prison, thus demonstrating that one of the leading figures in the Argentine military institutions of the 20th century, no matter how skilled a military professional you are, only your political stance matters. This view only degraded the professional and military skills of our human capital throughout the 20th century, while the military institution became increasingly bureaucratic. Illustration: “The Defender of the Homeland”, 🖼 painting by Pablo Patricio Albornoz